TRANSCRYPT

The following is a transcript of a dictation. An effort is due to this essay. To make sense with sound.

The Wizard of Oz

the Dialectic

and

the History of the World

Brothers and sisters, I just want to say something real quick. We may have an ability to pick up on the book that our angels wrote for us and that the enemy may have found a way to stop us from being inquisitive about. The incongruities in our history that would lead us to investigate certain things that would put into motion the plan that was for your life before you were even born. What I’m saying is that we may all be not reading the instructions given to us because a certain part of our psyche has been deliberately and intentionally closed off.

Here we have turning three very interesting tables. One, the Wizard of Oz, two, the dialectic. And three, the history of the world.

You ever notice how the Wizard of Oz has a green face, just like the Wicked Witch? Isn’t that weird? If I were to take a crack at it, let’s see this. I’d say that. You have analogs of the opposite side. Who is it of Oz last night? Give me a lesson that I’ve been turning over in my head. And I’m not sure exactly because the impages are something true, or… a certain beginning, that will be an active… In either case, this is exactly what… I’ve been thinking about. What? She meets the scarecrow. She meets Tin Man. And she meets. The Cowardly Lion. Right? Are you getting this idea of… The scarecrow… representing the Wizard of Oz, somebody who just doesn’t have a brain. And the house dropping on the Wicker Witch, was obviously the analog of the evil landlord. And Dorothy’s Kansas universe. That was just dropped on her in a way that, it’s like, what are you gonna do? We live here, was our family’s home. It’s our farm. You know what I mean? If you don’t have an army, you don’t have anything, what are you gonna do? You know what I mean? And so in that way, like, when she 1st gets to, uh, As she 1st gets hot. The house drops on the wicker which these. There are multiple stories going on at once, but they’re important threads, some more important than others. And some are so weird. And Strangely symmetrical, that whether it was written or done on burgers or not, is there? And has been waiting to be… Tabulated. The Wizard of Oz. His face is green. He’s got this huge brain. No. No, that Tin Man, they said that he was supposed to represent, you know, like the iron industry or like, oh, it’s being held up. There’s like some analysis I read. But for me, the Tidman represents the military, which is represented by these half monkey half bats. You notice how 10 men can’t move, and is these bats who can fly. But their monkeys? And not only that, you notice how they, like, basically, like tore Tin Man? In half, isn’t the green Wizard of Oz face just ahead? Almost like he’s torn from the body? If we were to say, like, scarecrow doesn’t have a head, It would it would be analogous to saying that the Wizard of Oz doesn’t have a body. or that his head was detached from his body. You know what I mean? And that we’re talking about a certain kind of power that regards the head. Has nothing more than the instrument for talking about a body without one. And the cowardly line, right? This is the real Wizard of Oz behind the curtain. Who is absolutely helpless. He has absolutely no way of defending himself and when he’s caught by everything that his evil side has done, Then he distributes… Nothing but acknowledgement. Almost like as a father would to his his children or a person would, to parts in themselves that they had denied. That Dorothy is the one to bring it to him. is prove that. The way Dorothy gets home, is by growing up. And in this way, you know, like, um, we talked about before too, like the Wizard of Oz. He’s this person. He split. His wife is split. And it’s like his childhood wife, right? You know… And then there’s this really, really sad story, beneath all of this, that in order for the farm to be saved, on TM, And her uncles. Put Dorothy to sleep. It had this lecherous fucking fortune teller. Raise high the roof beams. And have her return as if all of it was a dream. It was a sick movie.

This is something else, um, I’ve been thinking about. You know, like, the dialectic, when it goes through with the surface, and the statesman, and the dialogue, right, and Socrates meets the streams are familiar? And he’s teaching them the dialectic, like they first go through what an angler is or whatever, you know, just see what the dialectic is. And the dialectics, there’s nothing but splitting hairs. is a very sophisticated method of being rigorous about a definition in order to find out the meaning of a term or a word. And you begin by abstracting from its most broad of, and most general of, um, identities. And then you ask whether it is closer to one side, of that identity, or the other. So, like, for an angler, right? An angler is a, is a, is a hunter. But does he hunt on land or does he hunt on water? And it’s obvious he hunts on land. But does he hunt land animals or water animals? He hunts water animals. So, right there we have a beginning. An angler is a hunter who hunts on land. And hunt water animals. And we just go further and further. You just keep going all over and over, over again, until you get to the most very fucking most fundamental, basic, and exact definition. And you notice how it was there as a trace through all of those permutations. And the certain dialectic revealed the truth as itself. All these permutations have to do with a singular process of one step at a time, and two, one true step at a time, towards consistency. And one two step at a time, away from inconsistency. So it would be inconsistent if we were trying to figure out what an angler was, and we were saying it would be a hunter, and that it hunted on water. It doesn’t hunt on water. It stands over the water. It has a sphere, and it shoots its spear into the water to cut the fish. Yes, it, it hunts water animals, but it does not hunt them on the water, say, as a fisherman would, because you need a stable… Foundation. You cannot chuck a spear from a boat. An angler hunts water animals on land. It’s a very, very specific distinction. We have a name for people who hunt water animals on the water, and we also have a name for hunters who hunt animals in the water. They go inside the water and they like wrestle or they throw their their harpoon guns or whatever, but an angler specifically hunts water animals. On land. It’s a very, like I said, the dialectic, you take one step a time, and each step is closer and not farther. And you notice how the word will tell you what it is. And what you do, what you do, you brilliant, brilliant, magical being. You are able to make it spin and turn. And you are able to find where it begins and where it ends. And through the beginning, without any instruction, you can pose to yourself what it is versus what it isn’t. And every step will give you an exact definition of whatever the fuck you want to know about. This is what they meant by the logos. This is what they meant that there’s noose around us. That mind is manifest. This is the tradition that lasted all the way up to the 1800s, and Gio Grill and Frederick Hegel told the world, not some secret society, but told the world. That the rational is real. And that the real, inherently, is rational. And in that way, in that kind of broad scope of reality and using the dialectic over everything. Gear, Greyhound, Vedger, Hegel, and what we call absolute idealism. Propose the world where history itself moves in steps. And each step is legible towards something specific. In the phenomenon of your spirit, by Geer Grillhelm Fedrich Hegel, is a clear… legible delineation. of how history has led a people to recognize who they are, where they are, and who their fucking God is. This is the history of the world. According to Hegel, that man should come to recognize himself, by himself, for himself. Of himself. And in this way, God becomes manifest through man. And when man. Because manifest in the state and the state recognizes man,

When he recognizes men as the foundation, of his legitimacy, that’s when the state recognizes… Its identity, its foundation, and its purpose. As a representation, representation of the divine of God on the earth. This is all legible through your reason and through history. What Hegel does is says, I don’t need you to do X, Y, or Z. There’s no algorithms. There’s no middle person between me and you. The Greeks were right. Rationality is manifest, but not only that, everything is real. And he says this as a student of Goethe, who is also a person who devoted himself to the Persian classics, specifically of Malana Rumi. And the final chapters of Verom, knowledge, spirit, Absolute knowing. is described as. One’s recognition of God in oneself. And in this way, everything dissolves. It dissolves right back to the particulars. Because if God represents anything, it represents a certain capacity. To split things up, and to choose good over bad, period. At the very culmination of man, history, thought, time, space, and civilization, and God, is the capacity to take the step towards the good and away from the fucking stupid. It steps. So… The dialectic? It’s very interesting in relation to the Wizard of Oz. In relation to cinnamon relation to history. And what I had been thinking about is… A certain yes and a certain no in regards to certain cultural memories that return as authentic experiences, but are really, Friendly surfaces, encoded with the deepest and darkest, illogic and inconsistencies. And it’s contrasted over by an array of truly frightening cosmetics. A horror show. Zoology. Fashion. And sovereignty. There’s no step towards the good. It’s always just a step deeper into illusion. Now, when Dorothy wakes up, she doesn’t know what the fuck happened. And she’s keen to call everybody by their right name. And what we need to believe is between the time that she was knocked out, and the time that she woke up… There are three uncles didn’t… pass her out and sell her to some fucking landlord, because feudalism is the wizard of anything but God.

Perhaps? There’s no way around life around the one step. Perhaps the step is the safeguard to everything. Perhaps shortcuts, pathways, portals, wizards, witches. God, dogs. Uncles, Totem poles. Oxidated military might. And the naturalized animal rights. This step… would not have been there. It would not have been available, and therefore the Wizard of Oz is a fucking, is a fucking, a light show. In no world whatsoever would that ever happen? And it’s within these fantasies that they can suspend the illusion… in belief. We have something in cinema called the suspension of disbelief. It means the author is there? Because he knows that the person is watching… is ready to be lied to. And the question is is… Can we watch cinema without… Wanting it to be a device for us to escape reality, or to indulge in the kind of behaviors that make lies. Seem like they, they take us where we need to go and… help us who we need to be. The step is a holy thing. It’s one step. Lunar shortcuts, and it’s very specific why. Because it’s a chain. There’s a chain… Not from the beginning. But from everything. You ever notice how when you have been unlocked and you’re floating free, the danger grows. But the moment you lock in, and the moment the chain becomes alive through your words, through your thoughts, and through your movements. The concept of beginnings and ends doesn’t register, is it? The concept of coming to be and going to die has no relevance or even reality in your world. Surely we see people born. Surely we see people die. And yet, what we call life, is nothing but a goodness that knows no beginning, knows no end. Socrates says, that the Epicenya Tasuis is the good beyond being. And this is why Heidiger asks the question, not of what is a being? But that being capital B is not a being lowercase B, among other beings, lowercase B. That capital B being, again, is not. A being amongst beings, both lowercase Bs. Capital B being. What is that? And not only that, the big deal about Heideger is that his whole project is formulating the question of being. It’s not even answering. And we notice that when we formulate the question of being, everything. Becomes suspect. Everything regarding the time, everything regarding the space, authenticity, safety. Family, community, all of that. The world, not the earth, but the world. The world that has always been worlding, And you, who were always already there. Even before you put yourself to thinking. Or, even before thinking, had put itself to itself, through you. It’s a joke when they say that Jesus came out and he was talking immediately. It’s supposed to be a recognition. Step by step, a real boy is raised. Let’s go, let’s go. Friendly John? That’s not a shortcut. He’s not taking her to school. And Pleasure Island leads to one place. And it’s the worst of all fucking possible worlds.

The central question in my life is why do I wake up in a panic? And how is it so easy for me to just take one step at a time towards remembering myself, remembering who I am, what I’m doing, and where I am, that it slowly just starts to disappear. And I wonder, what is this chrysalis that overnight as I relax my mind? Engages in all of the opposite steps. And what is this opposite step? And how does it crystallize at all?

If you fuck with me or my family I want you to look through what’s going on right now and know that there’s a tank where you will be converted into the form that best suits your nature.